UEFA World Cup recap, 9 September
9 September 2009
Same system as before. Honorable non-European mention goes to the Bahrain-Saudi Arabia playoff in Riyadh, where two goals in stoppage time – including a remarkable Bahraini equalizer at 90+4! – saw the former go through on the away goals rule to face New Zealand in a two-game playoff.
Not many rank changes today, but lots of new math.
WON
Sweden 1-0 Malta (Grp 1)
Portugal 1-0 Hungary (1)
Israel 7-0 Luxembourg (2 – and the ouch of the day)
Czech Republic 7-0 San Marino (3)
Slovakia 2-0 Northern Ireland (3)
Slovenia 3-0 Poland (3)
Germany 4-0 Azerbaijan (4)
Russia 3-1 Wales (4)
Armenia 2-1 Belgium (5)
Spain 3-0 Estonia (5)
Kazakhstan 3-1 Andorra (6)
England 5-1 Croatia (6)
Faroe Islands 2-1 Lithuania (7)
Italy 2-0 Bulgaria (8)
Netherlands 1-0 Scotland (9)
Norway 2-1 Macedonia (9)
DREW
Denmark 1-1 Albania (1)
Latvia 2-2 Switzerland (2)
Moldova 1-1 Greece (2)
Liechtenstein 1-1 Finland (4)
Bosnia and Herzegovina 1-1 Turkey (5)
Belarus 0-0 Ukraine (6)
Romania 1-1 Austria (7)
France 1-1 Serbia (7)
Montenegro 1-1 Cyprus (9)
QUALIFIED (in addition to Netherlands, which was already placed
England
Spain
WHO’S UP, WHO’S DOWN
Hungary 2nd to 4th; Sweden and Portugal up (Grp 1)
Slovenia 4th to 2nd and; Northern Ireland falls (2)
Poland 3rd to 5th; Czech Republic up (2)
Norway 3rd to 2nd; Scotland falls – final (9)
OH SHIT!
Les Bleus ache for the recognition their international stature warrants, and for the second day in a row they get it. After earning a tie against Romania via an own goal (perhaps against is the wrong word?), France topped it yet again with the exceedingly rare feat of having their starting goaltender, Hugo Lloris, sent off for bringing down Serbia’s Nenad Milijaš in the box. The latter converted the resulting penalty shot into Serbia’s lone goal. I think maybe France was jealous of Denmark’s “What the fuck?!” moment last week. This week France earns both.
Credit where it’s due, at least: French substitute Steve Mandanda coped admirably.
PULP FICTION MOMENT

And to think the Serbs will qualify outright
“And I will strike down upon thee with great vengeance and furious anger those who attempt to poison and destroy my brothers. And you will know my name is The Lord when I lay my vengeance upon you.” Ezekiel 25:17/Samuel L.
The British press apparently decided that this match was to be the answer to Croatia’s defeat of England in 2008 that saw them out of the European Cup qualifiers. England apparently saw it that way too, despite a 4-1 victory at their last meeting. England proceeded to thrash the Croatian side – no slouches they – 5 to 1. Even Croatia’s sole reply was promptly answered by Wayne Rooney. That hadda hurt.
WINNERS
Slovakia and Slovenia – My two group 3 picks played exactly as I’d expected, if not hoped. (I’m obligated, and not unhappily, towards the faltering Northern Irish side.) Slovakia took the Orangemen 2-0, and Slovenia put in an impressive 3-0 against Poland.
Slovenia is now the only team that can overtake Slovakia, who are guaranteed at least a playoff spot. This would require two Slovenian wins – including against the Slovaks – and for the Slovaks to lose against Poland. I don’t think it likely; but Slovenia should make it into the second round and if they stay on form I think they’ll be surprise contenders.
Serbia – France’s foibles aside, Serbia performed admirably today. That performance guarantees that they’ll not merely qualify but, barring a disaster, will finish at the top of the group. This has to be attributed to their own skill before anything else.
Faroe Islands – I have to give the plucky Faroese props for throwing down the Lithuanians. Their inability to win seems not to have dimmed their enthusiasm. They get a tip of the hat.
Honorable mention to Scotland. They played their best game of the tournament tonight. Alas that they had not done against Norway, which turned out to be the group’s decisive game. Ironically Norway is as likely as not to be cut from the top 8 to go forward, so their effort will be for naught.
LOSERS
France – Look. Thierry Henry is not a team. He can’t score all your goals and he can’t do all your running. Not even with little Franck Ribéry running around helping him.
Bottom line, France got lucky in having a weak group. That is the only reason their dreams won’t end in October.
Sweden – What was their performance against the Maltese? It should not have taken them 80 minutes for a single goal against this side. It doesn’t bode well if they hope to hold their weak second place, much less catch up to the Danes.
Greece – A tie against Moldova? Give me strength. Latvia’s draw against Switzerland was relatively more important and now they’re nipping at Pheidippides‘ heels. Indeed I think I was too quick to disregard them, or at least too ready to give Greece credit. They’re now even money for second place.
Ukraine – Croatia’s drubbing should have been solid gold for them, since it would vault Ukraine ahead in any tie-breaking situation. But they drew. To Belarus. The cultural and historical impact alone makes me wince.
Turkey – They didn’t need a tie against Bosnia-Herzegovina. They needed the win. They didn’t get it. Now only an improbable Bosnia loss to Estonia will see them in with a chance. When your survival is completely contingent upon another team’s performance, something’s gone badly awry. End of the line.
Dishonorable mention to Denmark, who tied Albania, which can only be rated a failure. They can afford it, and everybody else in the group appears to have done the same, but now is not the time to let up. Sweden, Hungary and Portugal are all still contenders.
It’s quiet until October. We’ll see what we see.
World Cupdate: UEFA Group 5
14 August 2009
Previous: Group 1, Group 2, Group 3, Group 4
Group 5: At the walls of Sarajevo
Participants: Spain, Turkey, Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Armenia, Estonia
This group is almost more straightforward than the last. Spain’s victories haven’t been shutouts but they have had them without fail. Their last four matches include contests against Belgium and B/H (which is my new trendy abbreviation whose use of the slash mark seems offhand and clerical but actually incisively critiques the ethnic cleavage with which the country remains riven – pass it on), which may prove to be of interest. But probably not. Spain’s been on a roll since the Euro 2008, despite having a relatively overrated side, and their fluke loss to the US last month probably won’t break their back. Indeed my only real complaint is that David Villa is doing too much of their work. It’s a sign of potential weakness down the road.
Second place is closer, but at this point there’s really nobody close enough to challenge B/H. Turkey isn’t displaying much of that unbelievable never-say-die attitude that made the Euro Cup so entertaining (a loss for the whole sport, that), Belgium are between coaches and Estonia is certainly out of range – though like their Latvian brethrean I suspect this will be the last time in some while they’re seeded so low.
Then again Turkey would have to sweep their remaining matches to slide into second place (assuming Spain does as well; a Spanish loss at any point would scramble the numbers). This is not out of the ballpark – they’ve already beat B/H and they have no further matches against Spain. Belgium is a threat but not an overpowering one. Then again Turkey walked away with a draw against Estonia so consistent play is clearly not a factor of their qualifying experience. This is the problem they face, and this is the deficit between raw, aw-shucks enthusiasm and cool professionalism.
Prediction: Spain is certain to automatically qualify. Now that I’ve gone through the whole thing, though, I’ve talked myself into Turkey for second place. They have an amazing capacity for surprise and Bosnia and Herzegovina have limped through on relatively easy games. They are also certain to lose at least one of their remaining four, which Turkey is not. Also I’m nostalgic for my time in Denmark in 2008 when I watched them once again strike terror through Europe at Vienna. This whole affair isn’t particularly based on reason anyway.
Also, I know the allusion I attempted to make in the title for this group is inaccurate. Alas.