UEFA World Cup recap, 9 September
9 September 2009
Same system as before. Honorable non-European mention goes to the Bahrain-Saudi Arabia playoff in Riyadh, where two goals in stoppage time – including a remarkable Bahraini equalizer at 90+4! – saw the former go through on the away goals rule to face New Zealand in a two-game playoff.
Not many rank changes today, but lots of new math.
WON
Sweden 1-0 Malta (Grp 1)
Portugal 1-0 Hungary (1)
Israel 7-0 Luxembourg (2 – and the ouch of the day)
Czech Republic 7-0 San Marino (3)
Slovakia 2-0 Northern Ireland (3)
Slovenia 3-0 Poland (3)
Germany 4-0 Azerbaijan (4)
Russia 3-1 Wales (4)
Armenia 2-1 Belgium (5)
Spain 3-0 Estonia (5)
Kazakhstan 3-1 Andorra (6)
England 5-1 Croatia (6)
Faroe Islands 2-1 Lithuania (7)
Italy 2-0 Bulgaria (8)
Netherlands 1-0 Scotland (9)
Norway 2-1 Macedonia (9)
DREW
Denmark 1-1 Albania (1)
Latvia 2-2 Switzerland (2)
Moldova 1-1 Greece (2)
Liechtenstein 1-1 Finland (4)
Bosnia and Herzegovina 1-1 Turkey (5)
Belarus 0-0 Ukraine (6)
Romania 1-1 Austria (7)
France 1-1 Serbia (7)
Montenegro 1-1 Cyprus (9)
QUALIFIED (in addition to Netherlands, which was already placed
England
Spain
WHO’S UP, WHO’S DOWN
Hungary 2nd to 4th; Sweden and Portugal up (Grp 1)
Slovenia 4th to 2nd and; Northern Ireland falls (2)
Poland 3rd to 5th; Czech Republic up (2)
Norway 3rd to 2nd; Scotland falls – final (9)
OH SHIT!
Les Bleus ache for the recognition their international stature warrants, and for the second day in a row they get it. After earning a tie against Romania via an own goal (perhaps against is the wrong word?), France topped it yet again with the exceedingly rare feat of having their starting goaltender, Hugo Lloris, sent off for bringing down Serbia’s Nenad Milijaš in the box. The latter converted the resulting penalty shot into Serbia’s lone goal. I think maybe France was jealous of Denmark’s “What the fuck?!” moment last week. This week France earns both.
Credit where it’s due, at least: French substitute Steve Mandanda coped admirably.
PULP FICTION MOMENT

And to think the Serbs will qualify outright
“And I will strike down upon thee with great vengeance and furious anger those who attempt to poison and destroy my brothers. And you will know my name is The Lord when I lay my vengeance upon you.” Ezekiel 25:17/Samuel L.
The British press apparently decided that this match was to be the answer to Croatia’s defeat of England in 2008 that saw them out of the European Cup qualifiers. England apparently saw it that way too, despite a 4-1 victory at their last meeting. England proceeded to thrash the Croatian side – no slouches they – 5 to 1. Even Croatia’s sole reply was promptly answered by Wayne Rooney. That hadda hurt.
WINNERS
Slovakia and Slovenia – My two group 3 picks played exactly as I’d expected, if not hoped. (I’m obligated, and not unhappily, towards the faltering Northern Irish side.) Slovakia took the Orangemen 2-0, and Slovenia put in an impressive 3-0 against Poland.
Slovenia is now the only team that can overtake Slovakia, who are guaranteed at least a playoff spot. This would require two Slovenian wins – including against the Slovaks – and for the Slovaks to lose against Poland. I don’t think it likely; but Slovenia should make it into the second round and if they stay on form I think they’ll be surprise contenders.
Serbia – France’s foibles aside, Serbia performed admirably today. That performance guarantees that they’ll not merely qualify but, barring a disaster, will finish at the top of the group. This has to be attributed to their own skill before anything else.
Faroe Islands – I have to give the plucky Faroese props for throwing down the Lithuanians. Their inability to win seems not to have dimmed their enthusiasm. They get a tip of the hat.
Honorable mention to Scotland. They played their best game of the tournament tonight. Alas that they had not done against Norway, which turned out to be the group’s decisive game. Ironically Norway is as likely as not to be cut from the top 8 to go forward, so their effort will be for naught.
LOSERS
France – Look. Thierry Henry is not a team. He can’t score all your goals and he can’t do all your running. Not even with little Franck Ribéry running around helping him.
Bottom line, France got lucky in having a weak group. That is the only reason their dreams won’t end in October.
Sweden – What was their performance against the Maltese? It should not have taken them 80 minutes for a single goal against this side. It doesn’t bode well if they hope to hold their weak second place, much less catch up to the Danes.
Greece – A tie against Moldova? Give me strength. Latvia’s draw against Switzerland was relatively more important and now they’re nipping at Pheidippides‘ heels. Indeed I think I was too quick to disregard them, or at least too ready to give Greece credit. They’re now even money for second place.
Ukraine – Croatia’s drubbing should have been solid gold for them, since it would vault Ukraine ahead in any tie-breaking situation. But they drew. To Belarus. The cultural and historical impact alone makes me wince.
Turkey – They didn’t need a tie against Bosnia-Herzegovina. They needed the win. They didn’t get it. Now only an improbable Bosnia loss to Estonia will see them in with a chance. When your survival is completely contingent upon another team’s performance, something’s gone badly awry. End of the line.
Dishonorable mention to Denmark, who tied Albania, which can only be rated a failure. They can afford it, and everybody else in the group appears to have done the same, but now is not the time to let up. Sweden, Hungary and Portugal are all still contenders.
It’s quiet until October. We’ll see what we see.
World Cupdate: UEFA Groups 6 & 7
15 August 2009
Previous: Group 1, Group 2, Group 3, Group 4, Group 5
Group 6: England prevails
Participants: Croatia, England, Ukraine, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Andorra
In retrospect it seems rather comical that Croatia was seeded above England, but this just goes to show you the crisis that the English team has suffered the past several years – and the extent to which they are putting it behind them. Their Italian coach, Capello, appears to be doing something right in a big way. (Though there’s perhaps some pain in admitting it.) In any event England has decided that winning might not feel so bad, and win they have. They’re wiping the floor with everybody and have shown no sign of slowing.
Second place is a real dogfight between Croatia and Ukraine. Everybody else is in the dust – indeed thus far the bottom three places have defeated only those teams beneath them. So any game by the top three against the bottom three can be safely judged a pass. This makes second place all the more difficult, as Croatia and Ukraine have already played each other twice – tying both times. This means that both teams have four games remaining, one of which is a near-certain loss and the other three certain wins.
If this remains the case, 2nd place will go to whichever team can run up the scores against weak sides like Andorra and minimize goals allowed. Obviously should either beat England it would be a shock of epic proportions which would guarantee 2nd place – but still leave them far behind the Queen’s merry men. Croatia has to be given the edge on the strength of their more accomplished and broadly-capable team: all but one of Ukraine’s 9 goals have come from just two players. That’s not a team and it’s vulnerable to injury or penalties. If it’s about running up the goal differentials, Croatia provided a convincing shutout to Kazakhstan. Ukraine has not.
Prediction: England is certain to qualify at the top of the group. Croatia will take the second spot but it will be a win based on goal differentials, as both they and Ukraine will take three of their last four games. A loss by either against a team besides England would make their position irretrievable.
Group 7: La France – Aucune
Participants: France, Romania, Serbia, Lithuania, Austria, Faroe Islands
Something strange and awful is happening in this group. I’m not quite sure what it is yet.
Group leaders Serbia has thus far beat everybody except France. You would think this would put France in a dominant position, save the fact that their first game was an embarassing 3-1 loss to Austria (who couldn’t even nail down the little Faroese). They’ve not done much better subsequently; they tied Romania and in their last game beat the Faroese by a paltry 1-0. The Serbians, besides their respectable loss to France, have been free of mistakes, which is why they have a fairly substantial lead. The remaining teams have had spotty records against everybody else – there’s no clear hierarchy.
Now perhaps it’s clear why I say there’s something wrong with this group.
Serbia is clearly now in a dominant position; but this is the weirdo group, where Austria draws the Faroe Islands but beats France but loses to Lithuania. Can I honestly say, as I did of England and Spain, that Serbia will win every game they have left, including or excluding France? Not here.
Make no mistake that France is clinging to second place; their victory over the Faroes was supposed to be a home run. Instead they turned in another weak, low-scoring victory. This should have been a blowout. Perhaps the Faroese are a surprisingly robust small team – I had to remove a fairly long diatribe against them because of their stubborn refusal to totally suck. But the French must also be found wanting.
Then again you’d have a harder case still to make that Austria, Lithuania or Romania are going to be any real threat down the line. France’s stumbles don’t spell doom for a team as seasoned and powerful as they, even if they have fallen far from their 2006 performance and the retirement of Zidane; and Serbia have played tight and forceful and smart. It is more a two-horse race than it first looks.
If the Serbians lose only to France in their last three games – because in a group like this why wouldn’t they? – the Frenchmen will need a clean sweep to snatch first place. A single draw will relegate them to second. A Serbian loss to somebody else can hardly be ruled out, and that would make France’s path correspondingly easier. The rest of the field is not in serious contention and will probably only suffice as meat puppets for the current top two.
But then this is a group utterly defiant of probability.
Prediction: France will effect a comeback to take the group. (If anything it’s the most random plausible outcome.) Four victories in a row is doable if they can find it in themselves with their backs to the wall, and they can and should take all of their remaining opponents. Serbia are luckier than they are good – their wins are rather stitched together with duct tape – and as a result should land in second. Most likely, they’ll both lose or draw some, but France will find enough to come out on top.