World Cupdate: UEFA Groups 6 & 7
15 August 2009
Previous: Group 1, Group 2, Group 3, Group 4, Group 5
Group 6: England prevails
Participants: Croatia, England, Ukraine, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Andorra
In retrospect it seems rather comical that Croatia was seeded above England, but this just goes to show you the crisis that the English team has suffered the past several years – and the extent to which they are putting it behind them. Their Italian coach, Capello, appears to be doing something right in a big way. (Though there’s perhaps some pain in admitting it.) In any event England has decided that winning might not feel so bad, and win they have. They’re wiping the floor with everybody and have shown no sign of slowing.
Second place is a real dogfight between Croatia and Ukraine. Everybody else is in the dust – indeed thus far the bottom three places have defeated only those teams beneath them. So any game by the top three against the bottom three can be safely judged a pass. This makes second place all the more difficult, as Croatia and Ukraine have already played each other twice – tying both times. This means that both teams have four games remaining, one of which is a near-certain loss and the other three certain wins.
If this remains the case, 2nd place will go to whichever team can run up the scores against weak sides like Andorra and minimize goals allowed. Obviously should either beat England it would be a shock of epic proportions which would guarantee 2nd place – but still leave them far behind the Queen’s merry men. Croatia has to be given the edge on the strength of their more accomplished and broadly-capable team: all but one of Ukraine’s 9 goals have come from just two players. That’s not a team and it’s vulnerable to injury or penalties. If it’s about running up the goal differentials, Croatia provided a convincing shutout to Kazakhstan. Ukraine has not.
Prediction: England is certain to qualify at the top of the group. Croatia will take the second spot but it will be a win based on goal differentials, as both they and Ukraine will take three of their last four games. A loss by either against a team besides England would make their position irretrievable.
Group 7: La France – Aucune
Participants: France, Romania, Serbia, Lithuania, Austria, Faroe Islands
Something strange and awful is happening in this group. I’m not quite sure what it is yet.
Group leaders Serbia has thus far beat everybody except France. You would think this would put France in a dominant position, save the fact that their first game was an embarassing 3-1 loss to Austria (who couldn’t even nail down the little Faroese). They’ve not done much better subsequently; they tied Romania and in their last game beat the Faroese by a paltry 1-0. The Serbians, besides their respectable loss to France, have been free of mistakes, which is why they have a fairly substantial lead. The remaining teams have had spotty records against everybody else – there’s no clear hierarchy.
Now perhaps it’s clear why I say there’s something wrong with this group.
Serbia is clearly now in a dominant position; but this is the weirdo group, where Austria draws the Faroe Islands but beats France but loses to Lithuania. Can I honestly say, as I did of England and Spain, that Serbia will win every game they have left, including or excluding France? Not here.
Make no mistake that France is clinging to second place; their victory over the Faroes was supposed to be a home run. Instead they turned in another weak, low-scoring victory. This should have been a blowout. Perhaps the Faroese are a surprisingly robust small team – I had to remove a fairly long diatribe against them because of their stubborn refusal to totally suck. But the French must also be found wanting.
Then again you’d have a harder case still to make that Austria, Lithuania or Romania are going to be any real threat down the line. France’s stumbles don’t spell doom for a team as seasoned and powerful as they, even if they have fallen far from their 2006 performance and the retirement of Zidane; and Serbia have played tight and forceful and smart. It is more a two-horse race than it first looks.
If the Serbians lose only to France in their last three games – because in a group like this why wouldn’t they? – the Frenchmen will need a clean sweep to snatch first place. A single draw will relegate them to second. A Serbian loss to somebody else can hardly be ruled out, and that would make France’s path correspondingly easier. The rest of the field is not in serious contention and will probably only suffice as meat puppets for the current top two.
But then this is a group utterly defiant of probability.
Prediction: France will effect a comeback to take the group. (If anything it’s the most random plausible outcome.) Four victories in a row is doable if they can find it in themselves with their backs to the wall, and they can and should take all of their remaining opponents. Serbia are luckier than they are good – their wins are rather stitched together with duct tape – and as a result should land in second. Most likely, they’ll both lose or draw some, but France will find enough to come out on top.
11 October 2009 at 03:52
[…] – They beat England. I wrote in August that this would be a “shock of epic proportions.” And how. It was mostly ignored in the press, partly because the England-Ukraine game was […]